No.197905
i think there should not be "freedom of religion"
you give freedom to dogma, freedom to anti-freedom, which will engulf you eventually.
i will quote this from a muzrat channel:
>Why the surprise at the Islamist’s pragmatic, materialistic approach to democratic systems?! Aren’t these systems themselves built on such pragmatism?!
>This moral-religious accountability is projected onto an individual in defense of a system that does not recognize religious ethics, as it prioritizes human legislation over divine command.
>In contrast, the Islamist views these systems as spoils of war, since any land not governed by Islamic law is considered a "domain of war." The obstacle here lies in the ethics of permissibility for the Islamist, who only adheres to the constitution of Sharia, rejecting man-made laws or humanistic values.
imagine if, for example, china let ughyurs have political rep, instead of supervising them while bending their asses to the demiurge? would we see that fucking amazing laser sci fi thing? they would have discussed shit like sharia law i constitution blah blah, such crap.
No.197914
If bro cant explain well what he read then he didnt understand what he read
No.198051
جىق تاماق يېسەڭ، سېمىز بولۇپ قالىسەن