WHY DO INDIANS STINK SO BAD OH MY GOD I HATE THEM SO MUCH ITS UNREAL WHY CANT THE WHOLE WORLD JUST COLLECTIVELY AGREE TO EMPTY OUR NUCLEAR ARSENAL ON INDIA PAKISTAN AND BANGLADESH SO THOSE DISGUSTING PAJEET BIOMASS OF SUBHUMANS STOP STINKING UP THE PLANET
I despise their accent so much I can’t stand my coworker’s voice, he literally sounds as if he’s gurgling on diarrhoea Indians are such a disgusting race of poo demons
It's usually because of the food they eat Indian food is yummy despite smelling strangely albeit I've only ever really had American Indian food which I suspect to be a similar situation to Chinese food where it isn't actually Indian food but the most watered down possible version of it for the 'murican palette
The smell isn't actually all that offensive to me albeit and I think if you can't handle the smell of spices you probably have a weak constitution
If you want some real stinky niggas try living in proximity to Haitians, they are 10x worse than anything Rajpeet has in his pantry
>>393026 >Indian food is yummy despite smelling strangely albeit I must be the only one who couldn’t care less for Indian jeetslop or shawarma/kebab, I don’t really get the craze over it nor do I really see the appeal of it over local food I can understand the appreciation for East Asian food but perhaps it’s my own biases
>>393051 >hey dude want some tikka masala? <you... fuarking... race traitor! I will NEVER eat jeetslop! I'm staying true to my Prussian-Nordic roots and eating the food of my ancestors! Sauerkraut and pig intestines! Can't you see? Jeets are trying to export their fucking """culture""" to western civilization, and YOU'RE buying into it by eating their fucking quote-unquote food!!! You're a step away from eating the bugs at this point!!!!
joking aside I also support eating local food because long food chains inevitably support factory farming and deprive local food producers of business but I suspect you meant something more along the lines of "indigenous food" or something, that is, white people should eat white food
I'm not super crazy about Indian food as it is, I think it's good and if I were to go to India it'd be an interesting experience albeit I'd go to restaurants lel. Not touching street vendors. If I do go to the aryan homeland I'll probably go to somewhere like Amritsar which I understand to be much cleaner than regions like Mumbai and Odisha where many of the grody videos are produced
My main beef with indi and paki food is that they use a LOT of lamb and I think eating things that haven't yet grown is effed up a little bit. But many Indian places offer chicken as an alternative. It sucks because I like sheep and goat and you'd think if they have lamb they'd have those too but I guess most people don't care or something.
East Asian food is cool too, Chinese, Korean, and Japanese food is good and I'd lump Viet into "East Asian" culinarily even doe they're closer to south or southeast Asians geographically.
That said I wonder how many people refuse to even try indi food because of chud ideology. Kind of a shame how people can he so hateful and so single-minded that they refuse to eat food they might otherwise enjoy
>>393079 ><you... fuarking... race traitor! I will NEVER eat jeetslop! I did not say this, in fact if I was offered free food that happened to be of Indian culinary origin, I wouldn’t turn it down (so long as I trusted its sanitation; point being, I wouldn’t refuse a dish of Indian origin if I could trust that it was prepared cleanly) >I'm staying true to my Prussian-Nordic roots and eating the food of my ancestors! Sauerkraut and pig intestines! I think you forgot that I’m not even White >Viet into "East Asian" culinarily even doe they're closer to south or southeast Asians geographically. As much as I despise seamonkeys I do like their cuisine
>>393162 i belive that, Su-35 is generally designed more as a long range interceptor compared to the MiG-29. Not to mention the xoxols only had outaded (still epik) MiG-29s while the ruskies have MiG-33s (unused in the ookraine war i presume?)
>>393164 Its the latest modification air superiority fighter yah, would only makes sense it`ll score some kills although i think mig-31's also carry r37m since they are basically uninterceptible and can snipe stuff with impunity. Overall i think in jewkrainian war RuAF used a limited number of planes, su-34 to throw guided extended-range bombs (i think some sources said they dished out a hundred or couple of hundred a day on average(wiki says 3500 a month so yeah)), mig-31s for a2a purposes and also as a platform to launch X47 missiles, and su35s for covering su-34s and shooting down any ukie jets should they try to intecept anything. Frogfoots saw limited actions sadly, mostly because da west supplied ukros with manpads in abundance very early on although i distinctly remember a video of a frogfoot lighting up ukro convoy with unguided missiles which was kinda kino. >while the ruskies have MiG-33s (unused in the ookraine war i presume?) Ummm do you mean mig29m's or mig35's, i think mig 33's werent mass produced or something and we only have like less than a dozen of mig35's iirc >>393167 R77 mogs though
Ukropiggies just dropped how propulsion section of patriot missile looks like inside btw (not sure which modification, probably pac-3) Apparently it has 180 pulse nozzles which helps it correct its course, not sure if they`re one-use only or not though
>>394073 Its PAC-3 propulsion module >The PAC-3 missile is more maneuverable than previous variants, due to 180 tiny pulse solid propellant rocket motors mounted in the forebody of the missile, called Attitude Control Motors, or ACMs, which serve to fine align the missile trajectory with its target to achieve hit-to-kill capability.
>>394079 >yet another meatbag liquidator award it works against rockets too desu (although ukrs themselves said Patriot only has like 6% interception rate lol) >we need more focus on anti-armor munitions Tonks are obsolete though cuz you can just blow it up with a drone
>>394080 >Tonks are obsolete though cuz you can just blow it up with a drone everyone says this but the truth is that tanks are still the most efficient way to deliver steel unto target. and them military lads have been experimetning with adding miniguns to abramses as anti-drone ciws. and even if they dont have miniguners, as long as they have a flakpanzer gepard tailing them they are under no danger of drones.
>>394091 Well saying they are obsolete was kind of an exaggeration but its hard to use them on a battlefield if drones are present, although yes their firepower is unrivaled if you can create conditions to let them roam freely. >and them military lads have been experimetning with adding miniguns to abramses as anti-drone ciws. Drones are cheap and spammable though, and can hit you from your blindspot easily (for example in the jewkrainian war both sides use ambush drones which hide in the bushes and only activate to kill when something/someone gets close enough leaving barely any time to react), eventually you will also run out of ammo not to mention manpads danger still exists. As the same war shows though theres still no real option of countering drones though. >and even if they dont have miniguners, as long as they have a flakpanzer gepard tailing them they are under no danger of drones. Im not sure how good will it fare against small drones desu, probably could shoot down bigger ones ez. Although i remember there was a video of that one other german AA gun (sky...something) and it didnt do so good. For slower drones you could also use the interceptor drones which work pretty well although they wont be fast enough to intercept faster (over 300km/h iirc) ones.
Copters work well against them iirc but they also could be taken out easily. Probably we will see infantry transformed into purely drone/counter drone force sometime soon in the future too desu.
The guy who invented the gatling gun thought that since his gun would shoot much faster, massive infantry attacks would be useless because they would be countered.
Unfortunately he failed to think ahead that the attacking side would come up with strategies and use automatic guns of their own to counter his revolutionary device that supposedly "marked the death of infantry".
Conflicts have only gotten deadlier ever since, opposite of what he intended. -------
They guy who first strapped a warhead to a drone though that since his drone was cheaper and faster, tanks would be useless because they would be countered.
Unfortunately he failed to think ahead that tank design are subject to change to adapt the current battlefields, and the other side would also employ drones of their own to counter his revolutionary device that supposedly "marked the death of tanks".
Tanks have only gotten better ever since, opposite of what he intended.
Things in war are not obsolete because they are countered. Otherwise, infantry would be long gone. (This is the false retard assumption the guy who invented the first automatic gun made, and the same false assumption jewkranian drone operators make).
Things in war become obsolete when something new does the same job better.
IE: >Missile cruisers provide better long range naval fire support then battle ships >Tanks provide better breakthrough then horsies >Guns provide better killing then swords and bows
