From a young age I have viewed women as a different being, ontologically separate from Humanity. That is from Man. Whether this separation arises from societal conditioning or from the unalterable givenness of the body is secondary; the fact of the separation remains primary. I observed that they possess weaker, more delicate bodies. If I pulled a girl’s hair in school the repercussions were always more severe than if I punched a boy square in the face. The girls in school and university seemed to operate under a different dispensation of accountability. They got away with far more than the boys ever could. A girl could start a fight between two guys with nothing but words and emerge largely unscathed. All these elementary asymmetries produced in me a rational and lasting wariness.
The humiliation ritual called University, followed by my induction into the goycattle workforce, and concurrent with the maturation of my own cognition did not dissolve this wariness; it refined it. Years of repression and careful distance accumulated until they erupted. I began treating women with deliberate hostility. I would shoulder check them on purpose and then apologize. I would deliver statements packaged as compliments that were in truth precise insults and they understood them as such. Every effort was aimed at pushing women away from me. Yet to the surprise of my annunaki brain the opposite occurred. The hostility only drew them closer. I secured my first girlfriend by bullying her for her weight in university. Women appear to interpret hostility as a signal of abundance. The man who pushes them away is presumed to possess an overabundance of pussy and therefore higher status, which only intensifies the attraction. In my workplace I have watched the same pattern. Women are drawn to those who display explosive episodes of anger or overt aggression. In addition they prove readily commandable and manipulable once the pattern is recognized.
These realizations forced upon me one final question: why is this creature placed on a pedestal and granted the same rights, responsibilities, and expectations as God’s perfect creation: Man? Left to their own devices, women function as harbingers of complete societal collapse. I have observed this on the micro level in workplaces and friend groups, where coordination fractures and standards erode. I have observed it on the macro level in the actions of political women who advance open borders policies in the manner of Angela Merkel. After prolonged reflection I reached the conclusion that the second half of the problem is the Normalnigger.
Normalnigger men worship, adore, and grovel before women. They have fully internalized the belief that women are equal to men on every relevant dimension without ever stopping, opening their eyes, and testing the claim against observation. This internalization has produced disaster after disaster that has directly degraded my own development and quality of life. Forty years ago the presence of female coworkers or female superiors would have been unheard of, today it is the unmarked norm. Worse still, the same Normalniggers who affirm formal equality simultaneously exempt women from its logical consequences. The moment accountability arrives they reclassify the woman as a child: standards are lowered, consequences are softened, and the adult demand is withdrawn.
This is the architecture of the Antichristial times in which I find myself. Women are treated as equal yet shielded from equality’s burdens, and the predictable result is disorder at every scale on which they are loosed. Normalniggers sustain the entire arrangement by worshipping it and protecting it from correction. Hierarchy is inverted. The stronger is made to serve the weaker. The capacity for judgment is sacrificed so that perpetual exemption may continue.
